Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. McCool
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided June 24, 2004No. 3:03-0013PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ECHOLS, Chief Judge.
Presently pending before the Court are the following motions by Defendant: Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 26), Motion to Strike Expert Report and Bar Expert Testimony (Docket Entry No. 35), and Motion for Permission to File a Supplemental Reply Brief (Docket Entry No. 39).
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. (“DIRECTV”) is a direct satellite broadcast system delivering television and other programming to its subscribers. DIRECTV’s satellite transmissions are encrypted, or electronically scrambled, to prevent unauthorized…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Satellite Sports, Inc. v. Eliadis, Inc., D/B/A Melody Lane Lounge, Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., D/B/A Time Warner CableCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- William E. Martin v. Sgt. Earl KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Carolyn Carter v. University of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- DirecTV Inc. v. DeskinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. JacobsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Cablevision of Connecticut, L.P. v. NoferiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Debin Xia v. United Machining, Inc. and Wescast Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2026