People v. Conner
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
The People challenge the trial court’s recusal of the entire Santa Clara County District Attorney’s office (hereinafter DA). The recusal was ordered because of an appearance of conflict created by the fact that a deputy district attorney who was employed in that office was both a witness to, and arguably a victim of, the criminal conduct giving rise to the offenses for which defendant is being prosecuted. We affirm the trial court’s ruling that section 1424 of the Penal Code (further statutory references are to this code) requires such a recusal whenever there exists a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. Superior Court (Greer)California Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. RhodesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- People v. ZapienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. GamacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.