Legal Opinion

State v. Boykin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1961No. 146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The defendant seeks a new trial on each count in the indictment upon the ground the court committed error by (1) overruling his plea of former jeopardy, (2) admitting in evidence the defendant’s confession, (3) permitting the State to introduce the order for the post-mortem examination.

The power of the presiding judge to order a mistrial in a criminal case after the jury has been impaneled, and before verdict, has been the subject of review by this Court beginning with State v. Garrigues, 2 N.C. 241. The many subsequent decisions dealing with the court’s power to discharge a jury and order a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. State v. CrockerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. McKennaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. O'NEALCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API