Legal Opinion
Estate of Crosby
California Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1935No. S. F. 15018PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
The residuary legatee and devisee under the last will and testament of Lilly Crosby, deceased, prosecutes this appeal from an order of the probate court setting aside to the second and surviving husband of the decedent the sum of $7,847.55, representing the proceeds of a life insurance policy issued on the life of the decedent’s first husband.
On March 25, 1927, the Continental Life Insurance Company issued a policy of life insurance on the life of C. F. N. Klitgaard. Under the terms of the policy the insurer, upon receipt of due proof of the death of the insured, agreed to pay to the wife of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holmes v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re Estate of MillingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- In Re Estate of TellierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Appanoose County v. CarsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ogle v. HeimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Turner v. Marshack (In Re Turner)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Diener v. McBeth (In Re Diener)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Little v. Reaves (In Re Reaves)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In Re DunnawayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.