Legal Opinion

Sherwin v. Fletcher

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Contbact, on the following agreement. “ We, the undersigned subscribers, do hereby agree to pay the sum set against our respective names, the same to be pay able under and in accordance with the following conditions, namely: “ 1. The money by us subscribed is to be used for the purpose of erecting a building in the town of Ayer, to be used for the manufacture of boots and shoes.

Read the full summary

Contbact, on the following agreement. “ We, the undersigned subscribers, do hereby agree to pay the sum set against our respective names, the same to be pay able under and in accordance with the following conditions, namely: “ 1. The money by us subscribed is to be used for the purpose of erecting a building in the town of Ayer, to be used for the manufacture of boots and shoes. “ 2. The details regarding the plan under which the subscribers hereto shall organize themselves, and upon which said building shall be erected and rented, shall be hereafter fixed and determined by a majority in…

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The demurrer to the declaration was rightly overruled. The written agreement signed by the defendant was virtually a promise to pay to such person or persons as should be fixed at a meeting of the subscribers. This promise was at the outset an offer, but when steps were taken in pursuance of Article 2, and a plan was fixed and determined as therein provided, and the plaintiffs were chosen trustees, they became the promisees : and when they proceeded to erect a building in reliance upon the subscriptions of the defendant and others, and before any withdrawal or retraction by him, that supplied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cottage Street Methodist Episcopal Church v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Athol Music Hall Co. v. CareyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Hudson Real Estate Co. v. TowerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Hudson Real Estate Co. v. TowerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. Davis v. Smith American Organ Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Eastern States Agricultural & Industrial League v. Estate of VailSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. Martin v. MelesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Emerson v. GerberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  5. Robinson v. NuttMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API