Legal Opinion

Bayley Seton Hospital v. New York City Water Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Philip G. Minardo, J.

*613Petitioners Bayley Seton Hospital and Saint Vincent’s Catholic Medical Centers of New York (hereafter, collectively, Bayley Seton) move for a determination as to whether a resolution adopted by the New York City Water Board on March 4, 2005 violated “due process” and/or provided an adequate grace period following its implementation of a reduction in the period within which to contest water and sewer charges from six to four years, effective July 1, 2002. To the extent relevant, Bayley Seton had sought to challenge a water and sewage bill dated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Brothers v. FlorenceNew York Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API