Joseph A. White, Jr. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NICHOLS, Judge. *
This case involves an alleged breach by the defendant of a contract in which the defendant agreed to sell certain surplus realty to the plaintiffs.
It is our opinion that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover, since the evidence in the record clearly shows that the defendant breached the contract between the parties. The court has a difficult problem, however, in connection with the determination of the amount due the plaintiffs because of the defendant’s wrongful action.
The realty involved in the present case consists of two parcels of land which formerly were part of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Matoza v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Pikesville Home Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alabama Rural Fire Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Frank Naylor, Associate Administrator of the Farmers Home AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006