Legal Opinion
USAA Casualty Insurance Co. v. Anglum
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 12, 2005No. 04SC390PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICE, Justice.
Petitioner USAA Casualty Insurance Company (USAA) seeks review of a court of appeals' decision that its automobile policy is ambiguous with respect to when it can charge an adjusted premium for newly acquired vehicles. We hold that the policy unambiguously permits USAA to adjust its premium to reflect a newly acquired vehicle as of the date of acquisition of the vehicle. Accordingly, we reverse.
I. Facts and Procedural History
In June 1998, Respondents Sean and Gwen Anglum (Insureds) obtained an automobile insurance policy through USAA. At the time, the policy covered two cars, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Union Insurance Co. v. HoutzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Heller v. Fire Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Ga. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Criterion Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- TBL Collectibles, Inc. v. Owners Ins. Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
- RK Mechanical, Inc. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Federal Insurance Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Hoff v. Industrial Claim Appeals officeColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.