Legal Opinion
United States v. Sanford-Brown, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided March 17, 2014No. Case No. 12-CV-775-JPSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
J.P. STADTMUELLER, District Judge. 1. BACKGROUND
Brent M. Nelson, the relator in this qui tarn action filed under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729-33 (“FCA”), brings claims against defendants Sanford-Brown, Limited, and Ultrasound Technical Services, Inc. (together, “Defendants”) for allegedly fraudulent conduct that resulted in the submission of allegedly false claims for federal subsidies under the Higher Education Act. (Docket # 12).1
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Relator’s first amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Docket # 49).2
2.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Grafon Corporation v. Elmer P. Hausermann and Marten C. HausermannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Glaser v. Wound Care Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Sanford-Brown, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015