Legal Opinion
Portlock v. Apfel
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 3, 2001No. Civ.A. 99-931-RRMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McKELVIE, District Judge.
This is a social security case. Plaintiff Gwendolyn Portlock is a resident of Delaware. Defendant Kenneth S. Apfel is the Commissioner of Social Security. On December 29, 1999, Portlock filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision to deny her claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. On March 14, 2000, the Commissioner answered the complaint, asserting that Portlock is not entitled to disability insurance benefits or supplemental security income because the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Thomas Williams v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Evelyn ADORNO, Appellant, v. Donna SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kokal v. MassanariDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Campbell v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Portlock v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
- Gorecki v. MassanariDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Bush v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2003