Legal Opinion

Park v. Matthews

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the District Court of Allegheny county.* The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Black, C. J.

Testatrix bequeathed $5000 to her brother, to be received and held by trustees, and the interest or proceeds to be annually paid over to the legatee for his use and benefit. The legatee’s creditor attached the interest.

We hold that it was attachable, because it was his, in law and equity. If the trustees had withheld it from him, he could have sued for and recovered it. Wherever a party has a right of action, his creditors may attach the debt, unless it be for wages.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winthrop Co. v. ClintonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  2. Commonwealth v. SaundersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Roehm v. Stetson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1943