Legal Opinion

Roehm v. Stetson

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 21, 1943No. 3400Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, P. J.,

This matter comes before the court en banc on exceptions filed to the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Fenerty, J., sitting as a judge without a jury. It appears that on June 5,1940, plaintiff, May D. Roehm, obtained a judgment in an assumpsit action against John B. Stetson, Jr. On July 12th, plaintiff issued an attachment sur judgment versus defendant and summoned John B. Stetson Company, a corporation, as garnishee. The same day the attachment on garnishee was made, interrogatories and rule to answer were filed, and on July 30th garnishee’s answer was filed. On August…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Opperman's Estate (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Patterson v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  5. Cogswell v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API