State v. Martin

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant, noting that the bill of indictment only referred to the alleged armed robbery of Clyde Adams, Jr., contends that the trial court erred in charging the jury that defendant would be accountable for the crime charged if they, inter alia, found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant robbed “Mr. Adams or Mrs. Plott.” Defendant argues that this variance “ ... is an inaccurate and misleading mandate on armed robbery.” We disagree. This variance, if any, works no prejudice to the defendant and raises no constitutional claim of potential double jeopardy.

In State v. Harris, 8…