Legal Opinion

Seeger v. Smith

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1898No. Nos. 11,272—(122)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendants from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul, in favor of plaintiffs, entered pursuant to the findings and order of Twohy, J.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

This action was brought in the municipal court of the city of St. Paul, under the provisions of G. S. 1894, § 6118, which provides, so far as here material, that when any person holds over any lands or tenements after any rent becomes due, according to the terms of the lease or agreement under which he holds, the landlord may have restitution upon complaint made. Judgment for the plaintiffs for restitution of the premises, from which the defendants appealed. •

The defendants are husband and wife, and the complaint alleges that the plaintiffs leased to them the premises described in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodcock v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Radley v. O'LearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. Suchaneck v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  4. George v. MahoneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. University Community Properties v. New Riverside CafeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API