Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzales

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1986No. G000721PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSBY, J.

We were directed by the Supreme Court to reconsider this case in light of In re Michael L. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 81 [216 Cal.Rptr. 140, 702 P.2d 222]. Following a different decision, however, California v. Trombetta (1984) 467 U.S. 479 [81 L.Ed.2d 413, 104 S.Ct. 2528], we must conclude police failure to preserve an attempted robbery victim’s written description of the perpetrator’s tattoo does not require, as we formerly held, reversal of Joseph Gonzales’ conviction per People v. Hitch (1974) 12 Cal.3d 641 [117 Cal.Rptr. 9, 527 P.2d 361] and retrial with an appropriate corrective…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. People v. EppsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API