Legal Opinion

State v. Vick

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1998No. Criminal 980197PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Christopher Vick appeals the amended judgment of the trial court requiring him to pay restitution of $100 to John Mandy and $2,255.76 to State Farm Insurance Company. We modify the judgment of the trial court, and affirm as modified.

I

[¶ 2] On June 3, 1998, based on a plea agreement, the trial court entered an amended judgment dismissing four criminal charges and accepting guilty pleas to felony charges of unlawful entry into a vehicle, and theft, possession of stolen property, and to one misdemeanor, leaving the scene of an accident. The trial court also noted a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. SteffyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  3. Aldridge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. GatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. KensmoeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. HatlewickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. BingamanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Matter of WedmoreNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Rinas v. EngelhardtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API