Legal Opinion

West Bay Manor Co. v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1995No. 94-1462PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

West Bay challenges the BTA’s findings on the CON and personal property deductions. In both instances, West Bay contends that the record does not support the BTA’s findings. We disagree with West Bay.

“We will not overrule BTA findings of fact that are based upon sufficient probative evidence.” R.R.Z. Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 198, 201, 527 N.E.2d 874, 877.

We note that “[t]he BTA is not required to adopt the valuation fixed by any witness, and it is vested with wide discretion to determine the weight to be given to evidence and the credibility of witnesses…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Witt Co. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Board of Education v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Crow v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Zindle v. Summit County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Westlake Med. Investors, L.P. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gen. Motors Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. West Bay Manor Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Joliet Township High School District 204 v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board Joliet Township High School District 204Appellate Court of Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API