Legal Opinion

Fraley v. Ford

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1957No. 6243PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

Clair Ford, plaintiff, and Harvey Fraley, defendant, entered into an agreement whereby Ford sold to Fraley a tank load of rainbow trout to be delivered in the purchaser’s pool. Delivery was made and checks were given for the purchase price. Soon after delivery the fish died and purchaser stopped payment on the checks. Ford sued Fraley for the amount represented by the checks. Judgment for the plaintiff and defendant appeals.

Eliminating trivial and technical matters the question presented is whether the court should have rendered judgment in favor of defendant for the reason…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Philip Olim Co. v. C. A. Watson SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Harp, Hardee & Co. v. Haas-Phillips Produce Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Colvin v. Superior Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Nalbandian v. Byron Jackson Pumps, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Standard Brands Chemical Industries, Inc. v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  5. Bailey v. Montgomery Ward and CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API