Legal Opinion
Bensel v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 25, 2008No. Civil Action No. 02-2917 (JEI)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendant Air Line Pilots Association, International’s (“ALPA”) Motion to Compel the Production of Documents (Docket No. 220) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, and the Cross-Motion for a Protective Order of Plaintiffs, former pilots of Trans World Airlines, (Docket No. 223) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) and 37(a)(4)(B). For the reasons set forth below, we will grant in part and deny in part ALPA’s motion and deny Plaintiffs’ cross-motion.
I
As the underlying facts to this litigation are detailed at Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass’n, 387…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Harding v. Dana Transport, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Parkway Gallery Furniture, Inc. v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1987
- Maldonado v. New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Ciba-Geigy Corp. v. Sandoz Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rhoads Industries, Inc. v. Building Materials Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Gloucester Township Housing Authority v. Franklin Square AssociatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Wyman v. WymanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2020