Legal Opinion

Wrinkles v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2002No. 82S00-0207-SD-407PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

Petitioner, Matthew Wrinkles, by counsel, seeks permission to litigate additional post-conviction claims in state court relating to his death sentence pursuant to Indiana Post-Conviction Rule 1, Section 12. He filed a “Tender of Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief (Capital Case)” and tendered a successive “Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.” Respondent, the State of Indiana, by counsel, filed an “Opposition to Tender of Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.” Petitioner then filed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brice v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  2. Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  3. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McManus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API