Wrinkles v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A SUCCESSIVE PETITION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
Petitioner, Matthew Wrinkles, by counsel, seeks permission to litigate additional post-conviction claims in state court relating to his death sentence pursuant to Indiana Post-Conviction Rule 1, Section 12. He filed a “Tender of Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief (Capital Case)” and tendered a successive “Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.” Respondent, the State of Indiana, by counsel, filed an “Opposition to Tender of Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.” Petitioner then filed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Brice v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Zebroski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- McManus v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.