Brice v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
Defendants Miles Brice (“Brice”) and Leon Caulk (“Caulk”) (collectively the “Defendants”) await trial for first-degree murder, and the State intends to seek the death penalty as to each of them. In light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002), and the General Assembly’s subsequent amendment to 11 Del. C. § 4209 1 (the “2002 Statute”), we accepted four certified questions pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 41. Brice and Caulk v. State, No. 468, 2002, Walsh, J. (August 30, 2002).
The Defendants have been…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Swan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Paul H. Evans v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.