Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Frick Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 30, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Leslie Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Wilson Chappell executed to the Frick Company six promissory notes. To secure their payment he and his wife executed a mortgage covering certain personal property and a tract of land containing about 250 acres. The Frick Company brought suit against the Chappells to recover on the notes and to enforce the mortgage lien. The deed under which the- Chappells held title contained the following provision: “The party of the seeond part is not to sell nor convey this land to any one, except the heirs of the party of the first part.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jefferson, Noyes & Brown v. Western National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Wren v. CookseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  3. Chappell v. Frick Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  5. Cooke-Jellico Coal Co. v. Richardson's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Childress v. County School TrusteesTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Holliday v. Cornett, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API