State v. Boatwright
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 125,851 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JAMES D. BOATWRIGHT, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An accomplice instruction is not an absolute necessity when the jury receives a general credibility instruction and any juror of average intelligence would have heard the accomplice's testimony and an accompanying thorough and detailed cross-examination and realized that credibility was at issue. 2. In assessing whether prosecutorial error occurred, appellate courts do not consider a statement in isolation but look to the context in which the disputed…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- State v. ElnickiSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.