Legal Opinion

Durham v. Musselman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1827PublishedCited by 19 opinions

ERROR to the Johnson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Durham., in his declaration against Musselman, charges in the first count that Musselman, on his unenclosed land in Johnson county, cut a large tree so that it was nearly ready, and always liable to fall, and then built a fire around it, and negligently and unlawfully left it burning, and always liable to fall; which tree, afterwards, on the same day, fell upon and killed the mare and colt of the plaintiff. In the second count, he states that his mare and colt were running at large, *97in the unenclosed lands in Johnson county, and that the defendant knowing the same, hut contriving maliciously…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cole v. German Savings & Loan Soc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Penso v. McCormickIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API