Legal Opinion

United States v. Grider

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 12, 1985No. CM 446968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WOLD, Senior Judge:

Rule for Courts-Martial 1010 provides: (a) Advice. In each general and special court-martial, after the sentence is announced and before the court-martial is adjourned, the military judge shall inform the accused of [his post-trial and appellate rights].(b) Inquiry. After compliance with subsection (a) of this rule, the military judge shall inquire of the accused to ensure that the accused understands the advice.

As noted in United States v. Rogers, 20 M.J. 847, 848 (A.C.M.R.1985), the analysis of Rule 10101 states that the rule is based on Senate Report…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. RogersU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. McPhaulU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. ClarkU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. WiegandU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  4. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. YoungU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API