Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Young

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 30, 1992No. ACMR 9101244Published

1DissentArkow, Judge

I respectfully dissent. While I agree with my Brothers on the law cited in the majority opinion, I disagree on its application to the peculiar facts of this case.

In addition to the comments of the trial counsel cited in the majority opinion, it is helpful to consider the complete discussion, at trial, between the military judge, the trial counsel, the defense counsel, and the appellant concerning the latter’s request for trial by military judge alone.

MJ: The government’s reconsidered [its] position about wanting to go forward [on the additional charges]?

TC: Exactly. I couldn’t have said it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TreakleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  2. United States v. MeansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. ButlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. WalkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API