Legal Opinion

Centennial Casualty Co. v. Western Surety Co.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 21, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2013-001381; No. 5231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.

Western Surety Co., d/b/a CNA Surety, argues the circuit court erred in (1) finding Charleston Auto Auction (CAA) and its insurance carrier, Centennial Casualty Co. (Centennial), were “legal representatives” pursuant to section 56-15-320(B) of the South Carolina Code; (2) finding section 56-15-320(B) applies when fraud is committed by either the seller or the purchaser of a motor vehicle; and (3) failing to address whether CAA was also the legal representative for the purchasing dealer, and if so, was a participant in the fraud. We reverse.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

CAA is a wholesale…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Mid-State Auto Auction of Lexington, Inc. v. AltmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Centennial Casualty Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API