Legal Opinion
United States v. Medina
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 11, 2007No. 05-14864PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Pura Medina, Isabel Cane-pa, and Isabel Guerra (collectively “defendants”) appeal their convictions for Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, Commit Health Care Fraud, and to Pay Kickbacks under 18 U.S.C. § 371, Health Care Fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1347, Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), and Money Laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B). Defendants argue that the government did not produce sufficient evidence to warrant their convictions, and that the district court erred at sentencing when calculating the amount of loss. For…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Charles Crawford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Anthony RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Yosany SosaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Chris VernonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. MateosCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.