Legal Opinion

United States v. Mateos

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 19, 2010No. 08-17178PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNOR, Associate Justice (Ret.):

Dr. Ana Alvarez and Nurse Sandra Mateos were employees at St. Jude Rehabilitation Center during its brief time as an operating clinic in 2003. St. Jude was ostensibly an HIV treatment center, but it was established as a front for a massive Medicare scam. The fraud involved falsely diagnosing patients with a condition that would justify treatments of WinRho, an expensive drug reimbursable by Medicare at a rate of about $4,900 per treatment to St. Jude. Because the treatment was medically unnecessary, employees at St. Jude would purchase only a small fraction…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. Jesus Rosales-BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Anthony RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. AzmatCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API