Legal Opinion
Meeks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 23, 1970No. 6 Div. 812PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAWSON, Justice.
The submission was on the motion to dismiss the appeal and on the merits.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is on two grounds, but we need consider only the first, which reads:
“The appeal was taken after the time for appeal had expired, in that the judgment in favor of the defendant was entered on January 17, 1969 (R. 51), plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled on October 6, 1969 (R. 55), and plaintiff filed security for costs of appeal on Tuesday, April 7, 1970, six months and one day following the ruling on the motion for new trial (R. 55).”
An appeal must be taken…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Richards v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Williams v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Loggins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Barfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Symanowski v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- Puckett v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.