Legal Opinion

Laventhal v. New York Life Ins.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided July 16, 1941No. 575PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLET, District Judge.

The action is for recovery of death benefits under the double indemnity clause of two life insurance policies issued upon the life of Eli Laventhal. The face amount of each policy has been paid. An additional amount equal to the face of the policies is due the plaintiff beneficiary if the death of the insured was from accidental causes. A jury was waived. The policies are substantially identical. Each contains the conventional provision to the effect that the policy and the application constitute the contract. The application provides that the insurance shall not be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. New York Life Insurance v. GamerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Manhattan Life Insurance v. BroughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  5. Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Lemmon v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. James Roller and Ruth Roller v. American Modern Home Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Harris v. General American Life Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
  5. Wyckoff v. Mutual Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API