Legal Opinion

Loeb Compress Co. v. I. G. Bromberg & Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 21, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Wood County; R. W. Simpson, Judge. Action by I. G. Bromberg & Co. against the Loeb Compress Company and others. From the judgment, the Compress Company appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookhout, J.

Appellees I. Bromberg & Co., a firm composed of I. G. Bromberg and E. Mayer, filed this suit in the district court of Wood county against the appellant, the Loeb Compress Company, and the appellees the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, the National Union Fire Insurance Company, of Pittsburg, Pa., and the Home Insurance Company, of New York, defendants, for the sum of $5,520.71, the alleged value of 122 bales of lint cotton destroyed by fire at Mineóla, Tex., on April 3, 1909. As there are several appellees and the Loeb Compress Company is- the only appellant, we will, in this opinion,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. SeinTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. EyerTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Woodruff v. Painter & EldridgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. W. A. Morgan & Bros. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Sulpho-Saline Bath Co. v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Exporters' & Traders' Compress & Warehouse Co. v. WillsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Farmers Gin Co. v. Texas Electric Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  3. Jackson v. Greenville Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API