State v. Ostrowski
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLeach, J.
The decision of the Court of Appeals, reversing the judgment of delinquency, set forth “four grounds for doing so on the record in this case.” Essentially, the Court of Appeals held that the trial court had erred (1) in not suppressing the handwriting exemplar, (2) *37in excluding the parents from the courtroom until they had testified as witnesses, under an order for the separation of witnesses, (3) in the exclusion of certain testimony on the basis of noncompliance with the requirements of R. 0. 2945.58, relative to notice of intention to claim an alibi, and (4) in the overruling of a motion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. BingOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. FlinnOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- In re M.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.