Legal Opinion

United States v. Angel Collado-Gomez and Gustavo Quintero-Gonzalez, Gustavo Quintero-Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 1, 1987No. 429, Docket 87-1329PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1986, Congress amended 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) (Supp. II 1984) to provide for enhanced penalties for the possession with intent to distribute of specified amounts of certain controlled substances, including a particularly addictive form of cocaine base known as “crack.” See Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, P.L. 99-570, 100 Stat. 3207-4 (codified as amended at 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)). The 1986 amendments did not alter the elements of the substantive offense, which require the government to prove that a defendant knowingly and intentionally possessed a controlled substance. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Rufus HollandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  2. United States v. Ramon FaluCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Anthony AgilarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Nector Ofarril and Louis RosaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. United States v. Gerald Levy (89-5980) and Calvin Black (89-6099)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Thomas TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Ray Thomas, United States of America v. Wayne Graham MasonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Reginald Sinclair BucknerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Tommy Lee Williams, Leonard WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API