Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. NationsBank, N.A. (South)
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is a motion to dismiss Defendant NationsBank from the above-styled case. The basis of NationsBank’s motion is Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; it contends that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against Nations-Bank upon which relief could be granted.
I. Facts
This ease arises from alleged contamination at a property in Fort Valley, Georgia, which was formerly owned by the Plaintiff Canadyne (hereinafter referred to as the “Site”). Prior to Canadyne’s ownership, the J.W. Woolfolk Company, and later Woolfolk Chemical Works,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Brandt v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Canadyne-Georgia, Corp. v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2001
- Canadyne-Georgia v. NationsbankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999