Legal Opinion

Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. NationsBank, N.A. (South)

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided June 11, 1997No. 5:96-cv-00114PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

FITZPATRICK, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is a motion to dismiss Defendant NationsBank from the above-styled case. The basis of NationsBank’s motion is Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; it contends that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim against Nations-Bank upon which relief could be granted.

I. Facts

This ease arises from alleged contamination at a property in Fort Valley, Georgia, which was formerly owned by the Plaintiff Canadyne (hereinafter referred to as the “Site”). Prior to Canadyne’s ownership, the J.W. Woolfolk Company, and later Woolfolk Chemical Works,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Brandt v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Canadyne-Georgia Corp. v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Canadyne-Georgia, Corp. v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2001
  3. Canadyne-Georgia v. NationsbankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API