Legal Opinion

Steele v. Neeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*109OPINION OF THE COURT

Kehoe, J.

This child custody jurisdictional dispute is occasioned by parallel proceedings in New York and Wyoming (see, Steele v Neeman, 6 P3d 649 [Wyo]). Petitioner mother commenced this proceeding in Chautauqua County Family Court, seeking to modify respondent father’s right to visit the parties’ child, and the father thereafter commenced a proceeding in Wyoming District Court seeking to enforce and/or modify his rights. On the father’s appeal, we must determine whether Family Court properly concluded that New York, as the child’s “home state,” has jurisdiction over the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Vanneck v. VanneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Michael P. v. Diana G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Steele v. NeemanWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Reis v. ZimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brillhart v. D'AndreamatteoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Zielinski v. WaymanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Wolde-Tinsaye v. McGeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API