Legal Opinion

Coolidge v. Inhabitants of Brookline

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1874PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEndicott, J.

This is a petition by ten tax-payers to restrain the town of Brookline from paying money from its treasury for an alleged illegal purpose. Gen. Sts. c. 18, § 79. On October 13, 1873, an order was introduced in the board of aldermen of Boston, that the mayor be requested to petition the Legislature for an act annexing a portion of Brookline to Boston. It does not appear that the order was passed, or that any further action was taken npt n it. The selectmen of Brookline, October 17 following, issued a warrant for a town meeting to be held October 28, to act, amante other things, upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Piqua Branch of State Bank of Ohio v. KnoopSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  2. Stetson v. KemptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  3. People v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Minot v. Inhabitants of West RoxburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Prince v. CrockerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  3. KingmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Mead v. Inhabitants of ActonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API