Legal Opinion

Benisek v. Mack

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2014No. 14-1417PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2Per curiam

O. John Benisek, Stephen Shapiro, and Maria Pycha appeal the district court’s *141order dismissing a civil complaint challenging, on several grounds, Maryland’s congressional districting plan enacted by the state legislature in 2011. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Benisek v. Mack, No. 1:13-cv-03233-JKB, 11 F.Supp.3d 516 (D.Md. Apr. 8, 2014). We deny Shapiro’s motion for oral argument because the…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Benisek v. MackDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. McManusSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Benisek v. LamoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
  3. Shapiro v. McManusSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Benisek v. LamoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API