Legal Opinion

Heilperin v. Levy

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by one Heilperin against one Levy.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

Particulars of the defense of payment cannot be ordered. Barone v. O’Leary, 44 App. Div. 418, 60 N. Y. Supp. 1131. As to the other matters, the allegations are merely in effect denials of plaintiff’s allegations of ownership of the bond and mortgage referred to in the complaint. Particulars will not be ordered when the answer is merely a refutation of plaintiff’s assertions, nor will a party be required to disclose his evidence. Smith v. Anderson, 126 App. Div. 24, 110 N. Y. Supp. 191. In a proper case, a copy of an instrument will be ordered to be given; but this is not such a case.

Motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Barone v. O'LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jacob Bros. v. KunitzerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API