Nathanson & Co. v. Macfadden-Bartell Corp.

Motion by the defendants for an order allowing prior examination of the plaintiff is granted on consent expressed on the argument.

The plaintiff’s motion for a protective order originally returnable on March 1, 1965, is advanced on similar consent and considered and decided as follows:

Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order, striking defendants’ notice of examination, is granted. Plaintiff attacks the notice of examination on both general and .specific grounds. Plaintiff’s general objection is that defendants seek its examination prior to answer, which is assertedly improper because of the…