Legal Opinion

United States v. Fidelity Trust Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1911No. 280PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit to recover a portion of a succession tax paid under the act of June 13, 1898, c. 448, 30.Stat. 448, 464; the action being based, on the act of June 27, 1902, c. 1160, § 3, 32 Stat. 406, which provides for refunding "so much of said tax as may have been collected on contingent beneficial interests which shall not have become vested prior to July first, nineteen hundred and.two.” . The petitioner, appellee, was residuary legatee under a will,- in trust to hold the,fund 'either as at present invested or in such securities as to my said trustee may be deemed safe,’ and to pay over…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt v. EidmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. HvoslefSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Uterhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API