Legal Opinion
Hudson Casualty Insurance v. Garfinkel
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 24, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heteield, J.
This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery, entered in a proceeding instituted by the respondent, the purpose of which was to cancel a certain policy of liability insurance issued to Harry Garfinkel, one of the appellants herein, and also to enjoin and restrain the said assured and the other appellants from instituting or prosecuting any suit upon the said policy of insurance.
It appears from the record that on or about the 6th day of April, 1928, Harry Garfinkel purchased a Chevrolet sedan, under a conditional sales contract,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Imperial Fire Insurance v. Coos CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Merchants Mutual Automobile Liability Insurance v. SmartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Roth v. National Automobile Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Ledvinka v. Home InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Ballard v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
3Cited by12 opinions
- Merchants Indem. Corp. v. EgglestonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- United States Casualty Co. v. TimmermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- Hicksbaugh Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Atlantic Cas. Ins. Co. v. Interstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. TiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.