Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Mahoney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1898No. Nos. 10,898-(199)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In the matter of the assignment of Arthur H. Ives and Amos P. Ireland, copartners as Ives, Ireland & Co., insolvents, in the district court for Hennepin county, the assignee, Alphonso B. Hawkins, filed his final account, the substance of which is stated in the opinion, and applied to the court for an order of distribution of the proceeds among the creditors entitled thereto.

Read the full summary

In the matter of the assignment of Arthur H. Ives and Amos P. Ireland, copartners as Ives, Ireland & Co., insolvents, in the district court for Hennepin county, the assignee, Alphonso B. Hawkins, filed his final account, the substance of which is stated in the opinion, and applied to the court for an order of distribution of the proceeds among the creditors entitled thereto. Among the claims proved was one of the Irish-American Bank, of which Stephen Mahoney was the assignee in insolvency, upon a note for $4,000, for money lent to the firm, signed both by the firm and by Ireland individually.…

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Arthur H. Ives and Amos P. Ireland, partners under the firm name of Ives, Ireland & Co., duly made an assignment of all of their partnership and unexempt individual property, for the benefit of their creditors, under the insolvent laws of this state.

The net assets of the partnership for distribution amount to. *160$3,151.65, and the partnership debts are $19,736.34. Ireland’s net individual assets are $4,000, and his individual debts $2,997.47. Ives’ net assets are $100, and his personal debts $415.40. Included in the firm debts proved is that of the Irish-American Bank for $4,078.89, which is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hanson v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Northern Bank v. KeizerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1865
  3. Roger Williams National Bank v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Ex parte NasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1880
  5. In re BradleyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re WilcoxDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1899
  2. Robinson v. Security Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  3. Davis v. CobbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API