Legal Opinion
Joy v. State Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 1, 1938No. 27760PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIBR CURIAM.
This is an original proceeding in this court brought by M. A. Joy and Altus Compress Company, as petitioners, to obtain a review of an award made by the State Industrial Commission in favor of the respondent, Jesse Long. The parties will hereafter be referred to as petitioners and respondent.
The respondent was in the employ of the petitioner Altus Compress Company on November 22, 1935, and engaged in a hazardous employment as defined by the Workmen’s 'Compensation Law of this state when he sustained an accidental personal injury. The petitioner furnished medical attention until…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Standard Roofing & Material Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Tulsa Rig, Reel & Mfg. Co. v. CaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Model LaundrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Wm. A. Smith Const. Co. v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- City of Duncan v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Souder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Skaggs v. Bennett Van & Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Shell Petroleum Corp. v. WorleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Mid-Union Drilling Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.