Legal Opinion
State v. Lopez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 28, 1994No. 2 CA-CR 92-0481PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA Presiding Judge.
The State of Arizona appeals under AR.S. § 13-4032(6) from the trial court’s order granting appellee Jaime Lopez’s motion to preclude the testimony of three witnesses. The witnesses, officers with the Tucson Police Department, had been hypnotized during the investigation leading to Lopez’s indictment for one count of third-degree burglary and three counts of aggravated assault. We reverse the trial court’s order and remand the matter for further proceedings.
Factual and Procedural Background
The charges against Lopez arose from an October 25, 1980 incident during…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Poland v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MenaArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State of Arizona v. Anthony Sanchez BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008