Legal Opinion

Odell v. Clyde

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Julia M. Clyde and another, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Hew York on the 20th day of June, 1898, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Hew York Special Term, overruling the separate demurrers interposed by said defendants to the plaintiffs’ complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J. :

The action is to recover upon three promissory notes. There are three causes of action which are the same, except as to the description of the notes. It is alleged in the first cause of action that the defendant Julia M. Clyde, on or about the 9th day of July, 1896, made her promissory note in writing, dated on that day, whereby, for value received, she promised and agreed to pay to the order of herself the sum of $4,925, at the Murray Hill Bank in the city of Hew York, thirty days after the date thereof; that the defendant Robert J. Clyde thereafter and before maturity duly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Prindle v. . CaruthersNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Milliken v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. Central Bank of Brooklyn v. LangThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Tidewater Coal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
  2. Ginsbubg v. Von SeggernAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Stone v. GoldbergAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API