Legal Opinion

Ginsbubg v. Von Seggern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, by the defendant, Arend H. Von Seggern, from a-judgment of - the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 17th day of Hay, 1899, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial at the New York Trial Term before the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

This cause was tried by the court without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff, from which an appeal is taken: The

action was brought to enforce the liability of a trustee under the provisions of section 30 of the Stock Corporation Law (Laws of 1892, chap, 688), for failure to file án annual report of the Schmalz Cigar Machine Company, of which corporation it is alleged the defendant was a trustee or director. It appeared that the defendant did not file either a report of the company or the statement required by the section referred to to relieve him from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fera v. . WickhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Peets v. BrattNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Rose v. ChadwickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. Cornell v. . RoachNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Lee v. JacobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Von StorchU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Matty v. SampsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API