Legal Opinion

Hacienda Ranch Homes, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 2011No. C065978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MAURO, J.

Real parties in interest Roger and Annette Elissagaray initiated a lawsuit seeking to quiet title to a five-acre parcel of undeveloped real property in Tracy, California. The trial court subsequently denied a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Hacienda Ranch Homes, Inc. (Hacienda), concluding there are triable issues of material fact as to whether the Elissagarays established adverse possession of the property under a claim of right.

Hacienda now seeks a writ of mandate, arguing that the Elissagarays cannot establish ouster as a matter of law. This court stayed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Preciado v. WildeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hightower v. Flowers CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Kaut v. Kelsey CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Morgan v. Druhet-Johnson CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Nat'L Gold Mining Corp. Vs. Hygrade Gold Co. Ltd. C/W 78984Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Nat'L Gold Mining Corp. Vs. Hygrade Gold Co. Ltd. C/W 78984Nevada Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API