Legal Opinion

Salt Water Resources v. Kirkpatrick & O'Donnell Construction Equipment Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 7, 1985No. 05-84-01165-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

Kirkpatrick & O’Donnell Construction Equipment Company recovered a judgment by default against Salt Water Resources, Inc. in a suit on a promissory note. Defendant Salt Water filed a motion for new trial alleging “the meritorious defense of failure of consideration.” Attached to the motion is an affidavit of defendant’s president stating: “Further, no consideration was received, in whole or in part by Salt Water Resources, Inc.” This statement is a legal conclusion unsupported by any specific facts. See Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan Association, 487 S.W.2d 702…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ivy v. CarrellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Ward v. NavaTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. West Coast Mining, Inc. v. Security National Bank of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alamo Home Finance, Inc. and Gonzalez Financial Holdings, Inc. v. Mario Duran and Maria Duran, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API