Legal Opinion

Young v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 2000No. 7, 8 E.D. Appeal Docket 1999PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

We granted allocatur in this case to determine whether expert testimony is necessary to ascertain if warning signs should be placed three miles away from a construction site on an interstate highway. This is an appeal taken from the order of the Commonwealth Court, which reversed the common pleas court’s grant of summary judgment for the Appellants. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the order of the Commonwealth Court, and reinstate the order of the common pleas court.

On September 28, 1989, Charles Young and his wife Doris Young, were traveling on Interstate 95…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Powell v. RisserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. ManivannanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Stoeckinger v. Presidential Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Pennsylvania Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Brandon v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API