Young v. Commonwealth Department of Transportation
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted allocatur in this case to determine whether expert testimony is necessary to ascertain if warning signs should be placed three miles away from a construction site on an interstate highway. This is an appeal taken from the order of the Commonwealth Court, which reversed the common pleas court’s grant of summary judgment for the Appellants. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the order of the Commonwealth Court, and reinstate the order of the common pleas court.
On September 28, 1989, Charles Young and his wife Doris Young, were traveling on Interstate 95…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Morena v. South Hills Health SystemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Reardon v. MeehanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Powell v. RisserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. ManivannanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Stoeckinger v. Presidential Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Pennsylvania Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Brandon v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.